Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 114545
Chart Axis Label Order not saved
Last modified: 2013-02-24 21:21:20 UTC
Chart Axis Label Order not saved on program shutdown and defaults to "Tile" setting when restarted. Other settings are "Stagger Odd", "Stagger Even", and "Automatic". To access the Chart Axis Label Order I double click on the chart, right click on the axis, select format axis from the pop-up menu and then select one of the displayed options. I have the labels set at 65 degrees, which is saved and need not be reset. I select "Stagger odd" or "Stagger Even" so the labels are readable and do not overlap and save the file. When the program is shutdown and restarted the Label Order is set to "Tile" and must be reset to the Staggered setting.
Text flow, Overlap field is also not saved.
wrong component. changed to Chart and re-assigned
Hi, sorry can't reproduce. Pls attach the doc and give a more detailed step by step description. Also it will be nice if you try to reproduce the behavior within a current developer snapshot. Thx
I neglected to mention that saved format is .xls... I don't see a way to upload to the site and I'm not familiar with "current developer snapshots" or where to find them. If there is a URL where I can learn about them, it would be helpful. I have a 452kB file that shows the issue. I can reduce the size more if needed. TF
Created attachment 71772 [details] XLS file where Chart Axis Label Order & Overlap field not saved
Attached XLS file with chart to show issue. 1. Open file, 2. observe x-axis labels are overlapped and unreadable. 3. Double click on chart bars, 4. Right click on x-axis, 5. Select <Format Axis...>, 6. Select <Label>, 7. Select <Order-Stagger Odd>, 8. Deselect <Textflow-Overlap> 9. Select <Okay>, 10. Observe x-axis labels are alternated, not overlapped and are readable. 11. Save File 12. Goto step 1 and repeat. TF
I am sorry, but the xls format is not capable of this feature (as far as I know). So it is not possible to save that settings.
Closing issue impossible to fix. Sorry.
You could actually fix the issue by making the default to have the Overlapped selection unchecked. This would be desireable as a nonoverlapped condition would be preferred by most users and the overlapped condition would be used in only special circumstances. I can't think on any at the moment. Perhaps an overlapped selection is not needed. I know of at least one instance where this is the case.
yes, worth giving a thought...
taking