Issue 35335 - chart x axis labelling much too inflexible for non-XY charts
Summary: chart x axis labelling much too inflexible for non-XY charts
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 11313
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: PC All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kla
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-11 20:30 UTC by Matthias Basler
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:18 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Shows the problem and my current partly workaround (13.94 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.calc)
2004-10-11 20:48 UTC, Matthias Basler
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Matthias Basler 2004-10-11 20:30:28 UTC
Any charts (except of course XY diagrams) use - in the normal case - a row or
column to derive their x axis labelings. This can f.e. be a date or time.

If working with large data sets (e.g. time series) with hundreds of lines it is
usually not desired to get each and every data point labeled on the x axis.
Also, the x axis grid will shop up on every single data point. Often it would be
desired to have the grid for every 10th or 100th data point only. The same
applies to the x axis ticks.

In principle this could work equal to the y axis where such settings are
available on the "scale" tab: main interval and minor interval (I'm not sure
about the correct names; I have the German version.)

With such settings for the x axis it would f.e. be possible to create a chart
for a multi-day time series of hourly values in which the x axis is just labeled
once for each day and the x axis grid consists of merely one line per day.
Comment 1 Matthias Basler 2004-10-11 20:48:11 UTC
Created attachment 18292 [details]
Shows the problem and my current partly workaround
Comment 2 kla 2004-10-14 09:59:21 UTC
Thx Matthias, great job.
Your Attachment shows definite the problem.
But its an duplicate an hopefully will be fixed with the new chart.
Regards

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 11313 ***
Comment 3 kla 2004-10-14 09:59:42 UTC
closed as duplicate