Issue 38855 - Incorrect import of Excel chart
Summary: Incorrect import of Excel chart
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 3997
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kla
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-12-12 11:52 UTC by ais
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:18 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Document containing example, that triggers incorrect inport of chart in calc (45.50 KB, application/vnd.ms-excel)
2004-12-12 11:54 UTC, ais 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ais 2004-12-12 11:52:24 UTC 
The attached excel spreadsheet contains two charts on the page named: 16_01_01

The first chart is incorrectly imported in OOO Calc.

1. The legend is incorrect, theres only supposed to be 5 elements, in Calc there
are 14 elements
2. The scale on the X-axis is wrong. In Excel it goes from 63 -> 8000. In calc
it goes from 127,9 -> 136,2 -> 123,9
3. The chart in Calc seems to have three vertical lines in the chart.
4. In Excel the first series "Effekt LWA" is visible, howeven in calc it's gone,
altough is should be visible according to the axis.

I'm not sure whether this is a Chart problem or a Calc problem, since I have no
idea which part of the import fails. So I'm placing it in the Calc area.

I belive that the spreadsheet was first created with Excel 2000, or atleast has
been edited with Excel 2000.

This issue also affects Calc 1.1.3.
Comment 1 ais 2004-12-12 11:54:10 UTC 
Created attachment 20440 [details]
Document containing example, that triggers incorrect inport of chart in calc
Comment 2 oc 2004-12-13 11:10:34 UTC 
reassigned to chart component
Comment 3 kla 2004-12-15 08:39:34 UTC 
change prio./type to an realistic value.
Comment 4 kla 2005-01-10 11:47:26 UTC 
duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 3997 ***
Comment 5 kla 2005-01-10 11:47:53 UTC 
closed as duplicate