Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 64001
axes in 3D chart do not match standard conventions
Last modified: 2013-02-24 21:22:48 UTC
Usually (in math, computer graphics, MS Excel...) the z axis is up. When using the "wizard" in the spreadsheet to label the axes on a 3D chart, the vertical axis is the y axis. (Wrong.)
wrong component, changed to chart and re-assigned to owner of component. Frank
@BM: As Owner of an Mac pls have a look.
Is this really an issue for you? I have observed Excel. If you take a simple bar chart, you have the y-axis up. When you change this to 3d, the chart looks almost exactly the same, only the bars look "3d". Then you have an x-axis for categories, no y-axis and a z-axis that represents the same as the y-axis did before. I, personally, find this more confusing than calling the axis the same as before. BTW., in Excel the axis pointing upin a 3d chart is identical to the axis pointing up in a 2d chart (internally). The only difference is in the UI. (For whatever reason). Apart from that, in mathematics it is not required that the z-axis points up, it's just convention of some (maybe most) people. In computer graphics it is common to have the z-axis pointing out of the 2d plane, and x and y is like in 2d. (This reflects also the rationale for calling the order of 2d objects z-order). So we are doing it like in computer graphics (just that z points into the other direction). I don't see as an issue. One might think about dropping those letters completely and talk about value-axis, category-axis and series axis (like Excel does in addition to the letters). But I don't think renaming would make things clearer to anyone (including mathematicians, who generally call their axes x_0, x_1, x_2 ..., x_n if they happen to have finite coordinate systems ;-) )
BTW. this is not a Mac Issue, therefore I changed the Platform.
->saddington: Sorry, that I closed this bug already. That was maybe a bit fast. If you still have concerns, please reopen this issue.