Issue 70745 - Secondary Y-axis and column chart doesn't work.
Summary: Secondary Y-axis and column chart doesn't work.
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 26795
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kla
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-10-23 14:42 UTC by jlandert
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Screenshots of before and after allocating the dataset ot secondary y-axis (33.48 KB, application/pdf)
2006-10-23 14:51 UTC, jlandert 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description jlandert 2006-10-23 14:42:37 UTC 
Ok, I have several places with rain and temperature data. the places should be
on x-axis with each of it having two columns beside of each other: One for the
rain and one for the temperature. for the two different kinds of columns I need
two y-axis. Inserting a secundary y-axis in my existing column-chart works
perfectly. but as soon I want to allocate one data row (column kind - either
rain or temperature)to the secondary y-axis, the columns are messed up totally.
that means, that the two column-kinds (rain and temperature) are not futher
displayed beside of each other but are shifted above each other and are
fragmented. that happens in linux (Suse 10.1) as in Windows XP with openoffice
2.0.3/2.0.4.
Comment 1 jlandert 2006-10-23 14:51:53 UTC 
Created attachment 39997 [details]
Screenshots of before and after allocating the dataset ot secondary y-axis
Comment 2 bjoern.milcke 2006-10-23 21:49:22 UTC 
->jlandert: This is not a defect, and it is sure not prio 1. Maybe it is important for you personally, but 
that's not what the priority is about.

This is also a known feature request. See Issue 26795.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 26795 ***
Comment 3 kla 2006-11-01 15:23:06 UTC 
closed as duplicate