Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 72973
new Chart: When exporting to the SXC format, the datarange is lost
Last modified: 2013-02-24 21:20:19 UTC
When exporting to the SXC format, the datarange is lost, so no diagram is ok. -> #REF!:$B$7;#REF!:$B$7;#REF!
Tony, when does the range vanish? In the written file? Or when reloading with the new chart or reloading with another version? Could you please in addition attach an ods document that does show the problem when exporting to sxc. Thanks a lot.
Created attachment 41849 [details] Histogramme_2D.ods
Created attachment 41850 [details] Histogramme_2D.sxc
Created attachment 41851 [details] Histogramme_2D.ods
Sorry, the first attachment is not valide Open Histogramme_2D.ods with Chart2m10 Save-as .sxc format Open Histogramme_2D.sxc with OOo 1.1.5 -> the datarange is lost -> #REF!:$B$7;#REF!:$B$7;#REF!
Thanks Tony. Now I can reproduce.
->Björn, please take over as you are on the ranges.
changed target to 2.3
Looks like the files written were correct. However, they do not contain the proprietary chart:table-number-list attribute. Adding this attribute to the chart:chart element restores the data in OOo 1.5. The attribute was intended for binary format use only, but obviously it was also mis-used by the XML import in OOo 1.5. Solution suggestion: Export the table-number-list for the old SXC-format.
Quite a heavy one to fix ;-) OOo 1.5 needs the proprietary "table-number-list" attribute in the file to be able to read it properly. This attribute was intended for binary format only. Now, it is written again in the OOo XML format (.sxc), but not in OASIS format (.ods). This fixes also some problems with binary format (.sdc) Fixed in Milestone 11.
Please verify in chart2mst3 Milestone 11.
Where is the chart2mst3 Milestone 11 ? It's not here : -> http://graphics.openoffice.org/chart/chart.html
I think we need to wait a little while for chart2mst3 Milestone 11 . look at Current - Milestone10 - Integration Candidate 1 (21th December 2006) Previous - Milestone9b - Beta Respin (8th November 2006)
Seen ok in mst 11 -> verified
It's OK for me