Issue 80505 - chart2: de resources in the source...
Summary: chart2: de resources in the source...
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: jens-heiner.rechtien
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
: 80482 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-09 09:35 UTC by pavel
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:20 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description pavel 2007-08-09 09:35:32 UTC 
chart2/source/controller/dialogs/res_SecondaryAxisCheckBoxes.hrc:
	Text [ de ] = "X-A~chse"; \
chart2/source/controller/dialogs/res_SecondaryAxisCheckBoxes.hrc:
	Text [ de ] = "Y-Ac~hse"; \
chart2/source/controller/dialogs/res_SecondaryAxisCheckBoxes.hrc:
	Text [ de ] = "Z-Ach~se"; \
Comment 1 Arthur Buijs 2007-08-12 19:23:56 UTC 
*** Issue 80482 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 kla 2007-08-28 09:33:16 UTC 
@BM: pls have a look.
Comment 3 bjoern.milcke 2007-08-28 10:52:41 UTC 
This problem is already fixed. The file is "dead" in the HEAD version (1.3).
Instead there is a new file res_SecondaryAxisCheckBoxes_tmpl.hrc that contains
no "[de]" anymore.

->HR: I am very surprised that I don't find version 1.3 in a tag of this file,
except the anchor for CWS chart11 which bases on SRC680.m226. SRC680.m226 as
well as OOG680.m2 should have version 1.3 as tag! Was there a problem with tagging?

The file was deleted on version 1.2.36.1 (for Issue 80440) in CWS
localisation21, which is integrated into version SRC680.m226 (that's what EIS
says and experience shows in a German version).

> cd chart2/source/controller/dialogs
> cvs log res_SecondaryAxisCheckBoxes.hrc | grep "1\.3"
head: 1.3
        CWS_SRC680_CHART11_ANCHOR: 1.3
revision 1.3
Comment 4 jens-heiner.rechtien 2007-08-28 11:04:19 UTC 
@bm: Dead revisions, as a rule, get never tagged. How should this work? The
workflow is as follows:

- remove file during integration
- update master workspace to the latest stuff -> file gets removed from workspace
- tag the new workspace -> file gets not tagged as it is no longer there

Tagging dead revisions would create a number of problems,including the
interesting question for how many milestones in future the dead revision should
be tagged.

Note that the anchor tag might be on a dead revision, this happens during resync
as a special way to come around to some CVS quirk.

All CWS tools and CVS itself interpret a missing tag as "file is not there".
Comment 5 jens-heiner.rechtien 2007-08-28 11:13:04 UTC 
The file is dead on SRC680 (HEAD: 1.3), dead on OOG680 (1.2.44.1) and removed
from the OOG680 workspace -> so what is wrong? Set issue to invalid.
Comment 6 jens-heiner.rechtien 2007-12-21 13:16:01 UTC 
Close.