Issue 21603 - Fundamental Chart features broken/missing
Summary: Fundamental Chart features broken/missing
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kla
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
: 54500 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-23 11:40 UTC by yourcat
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description yourcat 2003-10-23 11:40:32 UTC
When creating a chart in Calc, the data groups are very restricted,
making it completely impossible to use Charts in some cases.

1) You can not specify a data group independent of other groups.
For example, if you have two sets of numbers, one set being a
column, say A1:A10 and an other set that us a row, C5:I5, you can
not put them into charts as 2 sets of data.Chart will create many
sets of data, depending on whether you specify column or row ordering.

2) You can not specify data sets which are not a continuous region
of a column or row. You can not, for example, tell chart that you
want A1:A10;C3:C8 to be drawn as *one* set of data.

3) If you have XY chart, you can only have one X value set. 
You can not create a chart where the X values for two (x,y) 
point sets (that is, for example 2 sets of measurements)
are not the same. You can not tell chart that A1:A10 are the
X values for the first function, B1:B10 are the Y-s, C1:C10
the X-es for the second function and D1:D10 are its Y-s. If you
specify the range (A1:D10), Chart will treat A1:A10 as X values
for 3 functions, in the columns B, C and D respectively.
This means that you CAN NOT create a scattergram for comparing
objects at all, rendering Chart useless for a lot of scientific
publication purposes.

4) If you have an XY chart, even if it is just one function, Chart
insists that the X values are sorted. That means that you can not
use Charts to plot a 2D parametric function, quite often used in
scientific and engineering publications and/or work.

Both Excel'97 and ApplixWare allows you to individually set up
data groups. A data group can be any combination of of cells,
you can even list completely independent cells if you want, like
A1;C10;B3;A9;F33;D7 and so on.
For XY charts both programs allow you to set up independent (X,Y)
sets, the only restriction that within any given set the number
of X values must be the same as the Y's. For example, it is
perfectly legal:
Group1
X A1:A4;B3:B7
Y F4:M4;C3

Group2
X G7:G20
Y M7:M20

and the first set has 9 (x,y) points in it, the second one 14.

I addition, there is NO restriction on the X elements, they can be in
any order, so you can plot a circle, a spiral or whatever else you
happen to calculate with Charts.

The above functionality I believe is fundamental and if Chart can not
do that, it indeed is a defect, not just a missing feature. It is a
complete showstopper for scientific applications. Non computer-scientists 
like biomedical ones tend to calculate and plot everything in Excel and
they *need* scattergrams, foldback XY charts and arbitrary data groups.
They will not buy into OO if they can't do that any more.

Not a showstopper, but a feature nevertheless, that whether a data group
is shown as dots only or lines or curves etc. can be set on a group by
group basis in both Word and Applix. It is a feature sometimes useful
for scientific/technical work.

Zoltan
Comment 1 frank 2003-10-23 15:15:46 UTC
Hi,

all what you're saying maybe correct, but nothing of it is an defect.
It's just how it works.

So your descriptions are enhancement requests.

Nevertheless I close this Issue as Invalid because we need one Isue
for each of your descriptions.

So, please file one Issue for one description with type enhancement
and Priority 3.

Thanks for your understanding.

Frank
Comment 2 kla 2004-04-27 10:43:14 UTC
No further response, so i will close it.
Comment 3 kla 2005-09-19 10:45:44 UTC
*** Issue 54500 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***